The NBA Has To Change It is Playoff Format...Now
If a fan took a quick always check in the 2006 Western Conference Standings an...One neat thing in regards to the NBA and commissioner David Stern is which they resolve errors with their game. Case in point in 2003 the NBA moved the first-round of the playoffs from a best-of-five game series to a best-of-seven to aid ensure that the greater team improvements. That's why it's mind boggling to wonder why they will perhaps not change the playoff format to account for debacles like this time.
If your non-sports fan took an instant always check at the 2006 Western Conference Standings and then a Playoff group, they'd scratch their heads in disbelief. The Dallas Mavericks had the 2nd best record in the conference at 60-22, three games behind conference leading San Antonio. The Denver Nuggets were 44-38, 1-9 games behind San Antonio. Yet, come playoff time as the Mavericks were the #4 seed the Nuggets were the no 3 seed. To get another perspective, please take a gaze at: publicidad en facebook. All since Dallas happens to-play within the same division as the top-three seeds and San Antonio NEED to be division champions. So now Dallas and San Antonio are meeting in the 2nd round of the play-offs as opposed to the Western Conference Championship, where in fact the two best teams must be meeting.
The no 6 seeded LA Clippers had a much better record as opposed to #3 seed Nuggets, to increase the turmoil. Consequently, in their first round line the #6 seed had the house court advantage! This is because the NBA allows the team with the better record the home court advantage...but perhaps not the seed. Does that make sense at all? Should not you also reward them with home court advantage, if you're planning to reward team champions with the top-three seeds? Or you could just compensate the teams with the greater record with the house court advantage AND the seed! This is not rocket science Mr. Stern. Visit this webpage publicidad en facebook info to check up where to deal with it.
If all of that wasn't uncomfortable enough, at the conclusion of-the regular season the NBA was up against the worst possible scenario for a sporting event a game where it was better for each group to get rid of. The no 5 seeded Memphis Grizzlies were enjoying the #6 seed Clippers with the loser having the inside track to the #6 seed and household court advantage in the first round. The winner would probably get a day and the #5 seed with the Mavericks in the first round. The Clippers lost the game and continued to obtain the # 6 seed, home court advantage, and a relatively simple gain over the Nuggets in the first-round. The Grizzlies won the game, the #5 seed, and were rapidly swept out from the playoffs by the superior Mavericks.
The NBA can not allow this to occur again. It's an embarrassment with their game and to all things sports. There should not be considered a game where it is in each groups most readily useful interest to get rid of. So what do I suggest?
The most simple and rational treatment for this problem would be to assure each team champion a spot in the playoffs, but then seed the groups according to their records with the seed often having home court. All ties in report would go-to the division champion. This however makes winning the division impor-tant it assures you a spot in the playoffs and the top of hand in link breakers but also ensures that the best teams get the best vegetables and home court advantage. I liken it to the NCAA Tournament winning the Big Ten or the ACC doesn't guarantee you a number one seed, it guarantees you an area in the tournament.
Here's what the seeding appeared as if this year:
1. *San Antonio (63-19)
2. *Phoenix (54-28)
3. *Denver (44-38)
4. Dallas (60-22)
5. Memphis (49-33)
6. LA Clippers (47-35)
7. Manhunter Lakers (45-37)
8. Sacramento (44-38)
*Division Winner
Here is what it would have appeared to be in my own proposed system:
1. *San Antonio (63-19)
2. Houston (60-22)
3. *Phoenix (54-28)
4. Memphis (49-33)
5. Manhattan Project Clippers (47-35)
6. Manhunter Lakers (45-37)
7. *Denver (44-38)
8. Sacramento (44-38)
*Division Winner
Remarkable! The top groups actually have the seeds AND have the house court advantage, all while still preserving the value of winning a division. This would prevent Dallas and San Antonio from playing in the next round, ensure that Memphis would have residence court advantage and not be stuck playing Dallas, and prevent Denver from obtaining the no 3 seed just for winning the division...all while keeping the integrity of winning a division by providing Denver the #7 seed over Sacramento for winning their division.
Please, please do the proper thing for next time Mr. Stern and adopt a method that is good for every team. Visit official site to explore when to study this hypothesis. Don't let this tragedy turn into the BCS. Do what you always do repair what's wrong..